There are many things I don’t understand. Physics, how the average person can tolerate seeing or hearing Gwen Stefani without wanting to punch someone in the neck, and the weird, fanatical love lavished on Jack Kerouac’s On The Road.
Since this year marks the 50th anniversary of the book’s publication there’s been much ballyhoo about Kerouac and On the Road.
Let me get this out of the way, the book sucks. If you haven’t read it and feel like you’re missing out on some sort of cultural zeitgeisty, classic book, you’re not. The book really does suck. It’s a rambling stream-of-consciousness blow job Kerouac wrote for his friends (Neal Cassady, Allen Ginsberg, William Burroughs, etc.).
There’s an odd, romantic glow that surrounds the Beats and their fuck you, peyote, pinko-commie attitudes that defied the uptight vibe of the fifties. I can dig that. In fact I do dig that. I even have somewhat of a Ginsberg fetish, and when I was in college I could recite the first bits of “Howl” from memory:
I saw the best minds of my generation destroyed by
madness, starving hysterical naked,
dragging themselves through the negro streets at dawn
looking for an angry fix,
angelheaded hipsters burning for the ancient heavenly
connection to the starry dynamo in the machin-
ery of night,
who poverty and tatters and hollow-eyed and high sat
up smoking in the supernatural darkness of
cold-water flats floating across the tops of cities
contemplating jazz,
And let me tell you, nothing impresses 22-year-old boys like a 6’5″ drunk girl spewing Allen Ginsberg lines. Oh yeah, baby. You want to hear me do “America“?
Sorry, I got sidetracked there which is apropos because, well, the topic is On the Road.
This is one of those books that so many people claim as one of their all-time favorites (along with The fucking Bell Jar, zzzzzzzz), that I often doubt myself. Maybe I am wrong? Maybe Jack Kerouac does know where it’s at.
But I’ve read the book three times, and I still can’t tell you what it’s about besides crazy, drug fueled road trips, and I think he said the prettiest girls in the world are from Iowa. That’s it. That’s how memorable it is. And, if I recall correctly, it’s not even a stunning writing achievement — I don’t often see it lauded for the beauty of its language.
I’ve struggled for years to understand the influence and enduring popularity of this book, and I think I might have figured it out.
It’s one of those books you read in college either for class or on your own because you’ve heard of it and seen that romantic Beat glow. And when you’re 22 what’s not to love about a book that’s all fuck-you we’re gonna go on wacky roadtrips and smoke pot? It’s rock and roll man.
Eventually all those 22-year-olds graduate, get grown-up jobs and kids and mortgages and a majority of them stop reading books that aren’t about boy wizards, but oh they always remember how much they connected with On the Road. So whenever anyone asks them what their favorite book is they turn to trusty On the Road, because it sounds way better then saying “I just don’t have time to read.”
And that, my friends is my theory on why On the Road has not waltzed off into the oblivion like it should. And if anyone tells me I really should give The Dharma Bums a shot, I will eviscerate them.

See? I love On the Road, am ambivalent towards Dharma Bums, and hated Desolation Angels with pure white fury.
Don’t know what that does for your theory, but that’s where I stand.
Well, it is a crackpot theory, remember that.
What is that you loved about On the Road? I am genuinely curious.
Hi Jodi – I only like Kerouac for sentimental reasons – I agree that his writing is way overrated. I blogged about reading OTR last year – see the URL.
enjoyed your blog – keep the ‘Mats faith, baby.
I totally want to hump your leg because you wrote this entry. In a totally I hate Jack way of course….
Thank you.
Kerouac is our nation’s most overrated writer. Strangely, though, I make an exception for The Subterraneans, which is an honest and evocative little book, but it was totally a fluke, he never wrote that well again.
I wholeheartedly agree with you, Jodi, and often rant myself when books of social significance are set upon a mantel of great literature (my own pet peeve is To Kill a Mockingbird, which makes me very unpopular among high school English teachers, especially in the south).
Wow, To Kill a Mockingbird? I remember wondering what all the fuss was back in high school, but upon further inspection I really love that story. I think it’s Scout’s voice that I love so much more than the bigger ‘social’ meaning of the novel.
Thank you. Ive never read it and dont really care to. I dont know why 20 somethings act like they care so much about sex crazed drug users of the 60s. I respect the hippy movement and kindof was one myself. That was loooong ago and i still feel like the most independent thinking person i know. That may sound arrogant but everybody i knew that was obsessed with that stuff back in the day have really just gone on to live either the typical dream lifestyle (marry someone you hate have kids, buy a flatscreen tv, die) ogo the alcoholic whore pee in the refrigerator steal your rent money route. Basically, theyre all liars, and i dont want any part of them. It almost seems like the lesson learned from these books is to be as selfish as you want with no regard to other people, but act like youre the sweetest most hyper liberal humanitarian on the planet. I dont think i have as much of a problem with kerouac as i do with the readers. Theyre the same people who tell me i overanalyze and read too much classic philosophy. Well, if whorin it up and drinkin yourself to death is a great philosophy, then by all means…i must be the ignorant one. I think most of these people lack a genuinely sympathetic bone in their body. I did read HOWL a long time ago. Its beat poetry written by a gay jewish man like 50 years ago about the streets of california. I grew up in a small town in illinois. Why in the hell did my friends care about this? A younger girl i like (i have no chance, but still) dismissed my recommendations of philosophical readings and said she would probably just read kerouac instead, since philosophy is “overanalytical”. It s very disappointing. How do i respond to this? I said that reading kerouac is the start of the path to mediocrity. Would you agree?
You didn’t get it all along did you? Keep your shit real, and just don’t give a damn bout the rest
I agree with all of this. I’m reading Hubert Selby, Jr.’s “Last Exit to Brooklyn” right now and I just keep thinking about how it reminds me of Kerouac’s stream of consciousness style but it’s actually about really heavy shit and not just bumming around and having neat adventures.
I was told I was going to love ‘On The Road’, but it took me 4 tries to finally finish it. The book sucks. Any romantic idea about going on the road and just having this crazy adventure is totally nullified by the fact that Kerouac kept wiring his aunt for money and heading back home. The title should have been ‘On the Road until I run out of money and have to have my aunt bail me out… again’ Also the premise is basically just a guy following another guy who bumbles around the country knocking girls up and abandoning them, all in the name of some sort of ‘madness’. I don’t call that madness, I call that being a shitty human being. I fucking hated this book.
Thank baby Jesus someone said this, because it’s completely fucking true.
On The Road was total crap, and only idiotic faux-rebellious 20 year old hipsters think otherwise.